Posted by thfcpoole
It had to be done sooner or later! Start with pics from prototype phones...
[ This Message was edited by: thfcpoole on 2006-06-21 20:57 ]
Posted by awave
yeh i really wanna see these pics up against my digital camera picutres (3.2mp fuji a330), i bet the digi cam. is better - but i still want to see!
awave
Posted by antichrist.old
http://www.gsmarena.com/review.php3?idReview=79&idPage=3
Posted by thfcpoole
http://mobil.idnes.cz/kdo-nev[....]?c=A060528_162958_telefony_dno
Posted by goldenface
Bump!
I think lots of people would like to see the cybershot snaps of this new phone.
Get snapping / posting kids!!!
Posted by toroa
EDIT: Pics Deleted - Pics way to large for board view. I have posted in Photo Gallery
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2006-06-28 00:38 ]
[ This Message was edited by: toroa on 2006-06-28 00:43 ]
Posted by toroa
Spot lightmetering, fine picture quality, shitty lighting condition, altou raind does not show on pictures.
Phone has booted a few times, and charger was DOA.
Posted by laffen
That's why I have created the Phone Photos section. Where everyone with a K800 (or other model) can upload example photos.
Posted by laffen
@toroa
Is the second picture is of the old Telenor headquarters?
Posted by toroa
Yes, its photograped in Pilestredet, with the old Telenor HQ at the right side of the picture.
Well spotted laffen
Posted by *Jojo*
@toro - Nice pics matey . . . just saw it before it was transferred by Laffen
I am certain that more will come/be posted here !
Posted by toroa
Pics resized. Just remove "_thumb" to look at full size images.
http://www.dropfiles.net/files/2901/DSC00015_thumb.JPG
http://www.dropfiles.net/files/2901/DSC00016_thumb.JPG
http://www.dropfiles.net/files/2901/DSC00024_thumb.JPG
Edit laffen: Changed file extention from .jpg to .JPG
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: toroa on 2006-06-28 01:10 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2006-06-28 01:25 ]
Posted by Residentevil
Pretty good pics. Overcast, so the camera is struggling to get enough light.
Posted by blackspot
What's with the aberrations all around? Are they using cheaper / poor quality lenses?
Posted by celltech
A few of my pics.
Posted by >500
check out the first pic from celltechs samples, that black merc is hot!
sorry for the off topic lol
Posted by celltech
Yeh it's hot for sure. SL55 AMG
Posted by jehrameel
just when are we going to get that thing here! waaaaaaaaah! ;( i think the fotos are nice though
Posted by brix25
Celltech, you lucky sod...ok, so now I know MTN is testing it but when will the phone be available in South Africa.
Posted by celltech
| Quote: |
|
Yo Brix. well the problem with the test units we have, it's
failing our data tests, we are awaiting our new units. I will
keep you posted.
Posted by croatia
test unit?just i want it some real does anybody know the price?sorry for my international english my mother language is croatian thanx
[ This Message was edited by: croatia on 2006-06-28 18:18 ]
Posted by kallegod
Some first test shots.
Posted by celltech
Great looking pics kallegod, keep them coming.
Posted by Digelius
Stockholm 28.06.2006
Posted by brix25
nice pics.
Posted by pow1990
im not too impressed tbh n80 takes better pics
Posted by celltech
Taken @ night without flash.
Watching mymobile TV.
[ This Message was edited by: celltech on 2006-06-28 21:18 ]
Posted by dreamfish
The quality of the photos won't be much different than the k750 will they? I'm sure the more pixels basically means the bigger the photo will look on screen without the picture being distorted?!
Posted by bluechips
pictures are actually pretty good. seems like refined, stable and really smooth. unlike k750 sometimes you will need timing, ambiance and focusing to get the perfect shot.
i'm greatly impressed with k800i.
Posted by Arne Anka
| Quote: |
|
More pixles makes it possible to show more details. If you shrink a K800 picture to same size as K750 pictures, you'll probably see the difference. On printed paper (normal photo size you keep in your photo album), its probably even more noticable. A thumb rule is that 3 mpx is the minimal pix resolution you need to get decent paper prints.
Posted by blackspot
Maybe it's just me but considering that this is a CyberShot model, I was actually expecting sharper / clearer images. The images are generally good though, I can't see any significant noise even with the poorly illuminated subjects.
Posted by *Jojo*
I totally agree with Pow and Dreamfish ! Looks like the camera quality of the K750i is much OK . . . Looks like there's not much difference from the 2 MP to the new - 3.2 MP . . . maybe we can spot a huge difference when it's already - a 5 MP
camfone 
_________________
1. tell me who your friends are and i'll tell you WHY !
2. most of them are idle now and i'm the ONLY one left OFTEN ONLINE ! that's COMMITMENT!
3. if i fail, i will FAIL others too !
[ This Message was edited by: JN on 2006-06-29 02:22 ]
Posted by Residentevil
Those are great pics. We are really getting something here.
Posted by Hurst
| Quote: |
|
I agree. There isn't really a largely noticeable difference between k750 and k800. I might just buy k750 and wait for the next generation with the purported 5mp camera?
Posted by rockygali
surely you cant have much from a 3.2mp knowing that youve came from a 2mp camphone... theres not much to see but more pixels and thats about it... but the good thing here is that there are other features present on K800 that you would like to try or maybe have it for safe keeping... the other features are still good to have.. in media player... GUIs... etc etc.. its all in there... not just the cam... tho we cannot regret the cam's capability... its one of the best there is in the market... and its not that bad i tell yah... just dont try rush things... SE will sonn get there.
Posted by *Jojo*
Yup, just like what I saw at the Canon's Chart:
3-4 MP Digicams ( almost the same)
5-6-7 MP Digicams (almost the same)
There's quite a difference with te 8 MP digicams
9-10-11 MP Digicams (almost the same)
There's quite a difference with the 12 MP digicams
13-14-15 MP Digicams (almost the same)
There's quite a difference with the 16 MP digicams . . . and so on . . .
I guess this method will also be the 'same' with those of megapixel camera fones
Posted by goldenface
Actually, laffen would prefer if photos were posted in the Phone photos section of the site.
Thanks
Posted by kallegod
Some more shots from Stockholm this afternoon
Posted by Digelius
More pictures from Stockholm 29.06.2006
Posted by dreamfish
Them pictures are really really good!
Posted by goldenface
Impressive.
I will put my neck out and say that I can see a difference, not much but those pics definitely look sharper. The image stabilisation probably helps alot.
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-06-29 16:51 ]
Posted by Minstrel_Man
Stockholm is nice and sunny today, then again so is Frodsham now.
I can deffinatly see the change in quality compared to some of the older pictures from the 2.0mp
Posted by goldenface
Likewise.
Anyone who says those pics are not good enough to print out needs new glasses!
Posted by Minstrel_Man
I've had this same discussion recently with people who cant notice the difference in digital and Hi Def.
Are these people blind?!
Got Sky HD 2 weeks ago and watching the footy on BBC HI DEF instead of comming through BBC through normal sky is amazing!
Posted by kulorex
guys, i think the camera quality will improve as SE releases subsequent firmwar updates. lets just be patient SE is good at this. my only concern is, BUGS. i hope this one won't get major ones.
Posted by bluechips
pictures are really good, the best in mobile. i'll grab one maybe after 2 months when the price is down.
Posted by bavlondon2
Could someone post some videos taken with it please?
Posted by Digelius
Three pictures from Stockholm!
[ This Message was edited by: Digelius on 2006-06-29 18:58 ]
Posted by bavlondon2
Ok enough pictures from Stockholm please!
Can we see a video.
Posted by Arne Anka
Sorry, you have not seen enough of Stockholm yet. Videos will have to wait.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2006-06-29 21:51 ]