Posted by naveensiva
wht do u think .... whether nokia is the best or Sony ericsson is best...
my vote is for SE
urs...
if u have any links
,comment 
,critics 
,comparison,post here 
lets see who wins....is it nokia or SE????
[ This Message was edited by: naveensiva on 2006-05-21 10:52 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2006-05-21 14:55 ]
Posted by Coxy
Its obviously going to be
here at Esato which is an forum. Theres no point to this thread mate.
Posted by naveensiva
ok let us se wht makes SE superior than nokia???
if u have any thing interesting.... just share with all...
lets see, coz most of my friends are noki fans...and i am hard fan of SE
lets see whether nokia has the edge or the SE
Posted by bluechips
you bring an old topic to a SE territory, anyway if you want nokia to win here i bet you throw some free high end phones to everybody where they can give it to their pupps to play with.
am i rude. im sorry im just a liittle bit bored waiting for some pending money transfer.
i just want to welcome you naveensiva here in esato..
Posted by snowdevl
SE - Style, Features
Nokia - Reliability, Build Quality.
^ In my opinion anyway.
_________________
I'd run a mile for a snowdevl!
[ This Message was edited by: snowdevl on 2006-05-21 11:25 ]
Posted by baste07
imho.. a useless thread.. what exactly do you intend to get from this? fire thread? you're in esato.... if your not able to comprehend... let me tell you.. this is mainly a SE site... go open a site and send us a link so we can vote if you want.
Posted by BobaFett
just to be fair: ERICSSON is the best. amen.
Posted by drgopoos
se is the best only becoz it has touch screen phones..... nokia is in stone age with this feature..
few other things that make se a better one are
faster phones, less crashing and longer battery life.....
support wise nokia cant be beaten....
Posted by BobaFett
if sg is faster or batt life is longer, its really individual imo. next to it i never missed touch screens at nokia, cos i hate that stylus solution. imo in 3g fones nokia is the winner, sE palette is poor and childish.
Posted by SexPest
I have had 10 mobiles 8 of which where nokia - i have a w810i now, the sony has sooo much to offer against all of my nokias (i have had so many coz the company keep updating them....)
SE all the way - they are jsut amazinly feature rich.
Posted by BChipman
I'm well chuffed with ma sony prefer it to any nokia i've had or that friends have bought, still tho on ma nokia i had a thing called lifeblog that could download all of my text messages to ma PC. Any ideas if there is anything like that for a 750i ???
Posted by drgopoos
bobett....
you should really try out the advantages the touch screen can give you....
you need not always use the stylus......
i have tried the touch screen models from nokia and it was a disaster... they are very slow and you have to wait for some time before you get a response...
none of the nokia handsets offers the long battery life of SE phones...
yes but the software and customer support that nokia provides is amazing....
SE produces very high quality phones but thats it.. nothing after that...poor marketing stratergy and support..... even the uiq3 that they introducing will have poor support from 3rd party developers...
they should have developed something that will support the previous uiq versions aswelll
you can see s60 with so much support....and the n series that they have is also based on the s60 platform helping developers....
so all is nothing but a balance....
i will support SE in the higher end category and nokia in the medium category...
Posted by kk.226
Nokia
Posted by Residentevil
By a mile SE.
Posted by bugsiiy
I haven't had a smart Nokia yet,so the most balanced answer would be,take BOTH. If you want cool sound,great camera (take de W series from SE e.g.:W800,W900 or the K series K790,K800) if you want a phone with all in one,but none best take the Nokias N Series,or the P990 from SE.This is my oppinion.
Posted by BobaFett
@drogpoos i tried the stylus, thx, but no thx. and imo a brand isnt more advantaged cos a feature, which is missing at another one. it was your individual decision.
Posted by kk.226
SE build quality is pretty crap though
Posted by Bambino
Nokia have bunch of model to be release with leading technologies. ie: 16m tft, un pnp, wifi, optical zoom, motion sensor, etc
SE is hardly breathe after announce w850, w710, z710, z550, m608c, and others in the future with mainstream tech. (what a loser)
Posted by Bambino
| Quote: |
|
nokia will have 6708 uiq next season!
Posted by jcwhite_uk
I think the best phone is the one that is best for you. Personally I prefer SE but for other people a Nokia might be better.
I have seen many threads like this one before. After a couple of pages they turn into a slagging match and get out of hand.
Posted by *Jojo*
Nokia of course . . . Samsung next !
Posted by SloopJohnB
i think nokia is always ahead in terms of new tehnologies because it´s got the biggest market share, more money to invest on research and a solid name that try and ´justify´ the big price for their top smart models.
Se is goot at making feature-rich, quality phones for a better price.
If you want the latest techs around and can afford it go for a nokia.
If you want a complete phone with great features, good design and cheaper price, go for se. (best value for money)
But i do think se could come up with a phone with the same form factor and features as k800 but with symbian os. For a more competitive price than n series, of course. It would atract n series buyers to a phone with not only the same functions but with a cybershot cam and walkman interface. That phone would be a killer. And i believe one day it will hit the market. Just gotta wait.
Posted by S4k1s
Depends really what you want out of dhe device. (not phone
)