Posted by k750irage
What do you guys think about this? Damn i was shocked. My favourite driver at my favourite team... And now he's contract has been finalized. He's moving to Ferrari next year.:-(
Posted by shyam335
I dont know whats the truth,ill be disappointed if its true,i really wanted to see kimi and alonso in one team.
http://www.sportnetwork.net/main/s85/st92043.htm?fromrss=1
http://www.f1galaxy.com/news.php?id=3059
_________________
There are a terrible lot of lies going around the world, and the worst of it is half of them are true - Winston Churchill
We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us - Winston Churchill
[ This Message was edited by: shyam335 on 2006-03-14 16:06 ]
Posted by Vein
Well that's screwed up the McLaren team for sure..
Posted by Krubach
Just rumours...
I've in another website that Renault wanted Kimi for next year... so ...
Posted by k750irage
Dudes. Its finalized. I heard it announcd on the news over the radio. Belive wat u want but its hapening. Ul c soon enuf. I dnt want it 2hapn thou. And yeah the move has rly screwed up mclaren. Stupid move 4them. But mayb its good 4 him. Mayb nw ther wnt b as much technical failiures 4him.
Posted by *Jojo*
This rotation among the players and it's cars is a GOOD move for them all! How I wish that Michael Scumacher will be transferred to A1-Grand Prix !
Posted by JK
ofcourse Raikonnen would move!!!
If Ferrari offered anyone a spot in their team theyd take it!!!!
Whats funny bout this situation is, Will Raikonen try and take out Ferrari this season??? Would be nice to watch!!
Posted by rockygali
yea funny... the car that he would likely try to beat at any circuit is the one hes riding himself in... a very odd feeling..
Posted by shyam335
More news!
Kimi denies latest Ferrari reports
Kimi rejects new Ferrari gossip
_________________
There are a terrible lot of lies going around the world, and the worst of it is half of them are true - Winston Churchill
We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us - Winston Churchill
[ This Message was edited by: shyam335 on 2006-03-15 10:48 ]
Posted by Bambino
| Quote: |
|
omg... ha3x ouch u make me laugh till im cryin
btw, kimi tranfers is a dilema 4 me. i like kimi but i hate ferrari. on the other side i dont pretty like alonso but i like mc larren. hmm... maybe i should side with aguri
Posted by artemiy
Midland go go go! (It's the russian ream!!!)
Kimi to Ferrari - strange, creepy... very... why will Ferrari do this? Two competing with each other racers - it's not usual in the red team...
Posted by k750irage
Why on earth would McLaren want Kimi and Fernando on the same team? They are both equally great drivers but then what's the point. I don't think they would survive together. They would both want to win the race, but the problem is I think McLaren would give preference to Alonso seeing as he is the new world champion. Kimi in my opinion is the hottest and greatest driver at the moment. If it wasn't for McLaren's lack lusterness and all those technical 'failiures' Kimi might have been the current champion. But that's just the way things work. You win some you lose some. Hope he stays with McLaren. Besides he wouldn't look right in RED. LOL
Posted by JK
| Quote: |
|
Two very good drivers on one team is good isnt it??
Kimmis good, but wheres hes stats to prove how good he is?? On paper hes pretty average... Mclarens fault? I think not.
Posted by senninha
i seriously doubt kimi would ever move to ferrari for as long as schumacher is there. that is, unless MS is willing to drop his undisputed number 1 status from his and the other driver's contract.
unlikely i think. i'm sure it is common knowledge that kimi is a much much faster driver than massa, right? now if MS barely beats massa in qualifying, i suppose he wouldn't be too excited about having kimi beside him. would be very interesting to see how MS' ego would handle it tho...
Posted by k750irage
@786. Come on dude. Do you really need papers to prove how good you are? How about I give you a car that destroys itself every second race and see what's the chances of you winning any races! Even Jenson Button at the moment is better than the 'great' Michael Schumacher. Problem is that the two future greats of formula 1 (Kimi, Jenson) don't have cars to support them. Don't denie it. Ofcourse it's not the car that wins the races. But the damn thing has to at least be stable and get you through the race! Papers mean nothing it's what you do when you're out on the track that makes you great.
Posted by shyam335
Even though the car was unreliable ,mclaren's were clearly faster after the 1st few races.
They had done one thing right,they gave kimi fastest car on the grid,but not the most reliable.
Posted by JK
| Quote: |
|
So hes cars always blowing up how do YOU tell hes a good driver???
Coz he does a few good laps?
If so then Barrichelos a good driver to!!!
Err guy if Kimmi dies today, nothing show his worth!
hes good, but hasnt proved how good he is all round!!
Jensens not a good driver!!!! You just listening to them Brittish commentators!! Hes not a driver who will be big in F1!! And to even dare compare him to Shumacher is just dumb!!!
[ This Message was edited by: 786KBR on 2006-03-17 13:19 ]
Posted by shyam335
Just look at the last race,he started at last with a full tank of fuel and managed to get into podium! Isnt that skill?
How much time he had 10 places penalty last year ,still he recovered amazingly well.
and i dont have that high regard about Jenson either.
Posted by JK
| Quote: |
|
Hahaha!!! Come now how many times did Barrichello do that?? Only he actually won!!!
Shumi did it twice in the past three years, of which I know of!!!!
You guys arent basing your opinions on those situations??? Rite?
I agree somewhat that Raikonens good, nowhere close to Shumacher and even Hakkinen for that matter...
He has to show what hes made of so far I think(if mem serves me right) he only has 1-2 1st place trophies!
Posted by Nitro Fan
I think Kimi going to Ferrari is extremly unlikely at present. But the paddock rumour mill is flat out at the moment!!
Posted by shyam335
| Quote: |
|
Last year ,as i said earlier,mclaren had the fastest car,but not like ferrari used to dominate in thier good days. With such a kind of machine,id say raikkonen had done a good job coming through the field (with overtaking difficult than the past, remember).
'raikkonen had 1-2 1st place trophies'
what was that supposed to mean?
If u mean wins,didnt u see last year gp's?
Posted by k750irage
@786. U jus a bit obsesd wit michael schumacer. Its getn 2u bcuz u cnt c true potential. How do u tnk michael schumacer bcame gr8? Definitly wit a car that holds itself togethr! Kimi has puld of sum of THE GREATEST overtaking moves evn on schumacer himslf. Kimi has got podiums wit a car that wasnt as fast as the othr cars in some races. And by the way iv said jensons good wen he startd hes career nt 4rm wen the comentators said so. Dnt judge b4 u sure of ur facts. Open ur eyes and stop ur infatuation wit MS
Posted by JK
Iv been a shumacher fan since hes days at renault, watchd him lose to maclaren to hakkinen, even give irvine the lead! The guys a legend and always will be! I do recognise raikonens potential but he hasnt proved himself to me! U know how montoyas cars always blew up? He drove it to hard, maybe kimis doin the same, a bad workmen always blames his tools, ever heard that sayn? We'll have to see on monday how he performs, i know i wont put any money on him!! :D @ shyam err i forgot wat i was supposed to say :P