Posted by axxxr
A man in Montana in the U.S,used his camera phone to take VIDEOS up the skirt of a minor in a store. He was caught by the store's video surveilance camera, and nine "upskirt" videos on his camera phone further sealed his fate.He pleaded guilty to felony invasion of privacy.
KFOXTV
Posted by goldenface
ROFLMAO
Is he on the phone to someone else while doing that too?
Posted by andymac
Looks like he's holding another phone to his ear.
Posted by methylated_spirit
Some people, eh? Still, its more subtle than a mirror on a stick.
Posted by dgilmartin
I can't believe its up to four years in prison for looking at some girls pants!
Posted by methylated_spirit
Yeah true, but she's a minor, so in this case i think its fair enough to be honest.
_________________
Hello, Scroto!
[ This Message was edited by: methylated_spirit on 2006-01-20 11:37 ]
Posted by dgilmartin
| Quote: |
|
Jesus! I didnt read that she was a minor. I was wondering about such a harsh sentence, but he deserves more time in prison, the sick b*stard.
Posted by batesie
whats wrong with some people eh?
Posted by andymac
Makes you wonder how many people are doing this AND getting away with it - sharing it with their 'friends' and putting them on the internet.
Posted by Pepi
recently there was a guy who made a topic with links to some perv sites - photos taken with cam fone
Posted by axxxr
I wonder what model of phone he was useing?
Posted by upper
probaby he was using the t68i to talk on the phone, and a Nokia phone to take the pervy pics lol. i think he was pretending to be on the phone lol so the girl wouldnt think nothink of it. lol an expert perv he is, looks like he has being doing this for yrs.
Will people agree with me that if she was wearing a long skirt down to her foot, this wouldnt of happened right?
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
NEW WORLD ORDER: www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-01-20 14:59 ]
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
Yeh but then you could also say that if she was wearing jeans or trousers...
Posted by methylated_spirit
So people shouldn't wear short skirts in case people take pics up their skirts? Thats a bit OTT
Posted by andymac
Probably not. Or trousers. But she shouldn't have to think about how she dresses because she might be a target for a perv wanting to take upskirt shots with his mobile. Mind you, if some bloke was crouching down right behind her and holding a phone under her skirt, I would have thought there should be a good chance she would notice!
Posted by batesie
lol. anyway they should cut his hands off so he cant do it again
Posted by axxxr
Cut his hand off?...think they should cut his you know what off!
Posted by upper
| Quote: | |||
| |||
Posted by axxxr
So your basically saying that women should stop wearing skirts and tight jeans just because a few pervs are lurking around with camphones?..so what are they supposed to wear then?
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
Posted by batesie
and if you cross a road, the outcome might be you get hit by a bus...
Posted by haynesycop
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
and about your question about what are they meant to wear.
Answer: Loose clothing. ie baggy.
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
which happened to me load of time last summer
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
I understand perferctly what your trying to say here but why should women have to conform to certain way just because men with dirty minds are out there?..I know women do get attacked for dressing provocatively but women also get attacked and raped in countries where women cover up as in some islamic countries,..and the end of the day men will be men and they will find a way to ogle at women in a sexual way regardless of clothing,dress..If anything women covering up or as you say wearing baggy clothes will only increase mens curiosity and make them do worse things..The only person who suffers is women from all of this and thats not right,society and its laws need to change of we are to rid of such crimes and people,not the way women dress..When i go out if i see a women i like yes of course i will see her in a sexual way,thats just the nature of man,animan instinct as you say,but i would do the same with a girl or women who was covered up aswell..just a attraction thing...female of the species and all that...women look attractive to us whatever they wear,be it a mini skirt or a whatever...and besides like i said pervs will find a way anyhow.
Posted by upper
| Quote: | |||
| |||
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
NEW WORLD ORDER: www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-01-20 17:04 ]
Posted by batesie
Upper.
99.999% of men can happily walk past a nice woman in sexy clothes without having stick a camera up there skirt.
its the few men that do this to minors that need sorting, not many women that like to wear sexy clothes.
So UPPER, would you also like to try and stop deaths by car crash by saying everyone should stop driving???
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
2nd: people are not driving around to crash there cars, its all about intentions of a person, example if a man was driving to crash his car, then yh he must be stopped, do you agree?
3rd mmmmm i dunno about 99.999% lol i would love to no where you got that statistics from.
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
NEW WORLD ORDER: www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-01-20 17:29 ]
Posted by batesie
upper. i agree that these perverts need to be punished.
but i dont agree that everyones freedoms should be affected by the minority which cant control there desires.
ok, a few people steal mobile phones. does this mean none of us should not be alowed to have mobile phones, thus take away our freedom???
sorry but your point of view is pathetic.
Posted by joebmc
A lot of women like to wear short skirts and revelling tops, why? Maybe because they feel attractive in them!
Would you like to dress in baggy cloths and look in the mirror and feel unattractive or wear cloths that you think you look good looking in?
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
well i think its all about being safe, and its not affecting no ones freedom depending how you look at it,there is a barrier where we cannot as human pass, like example batesie, you tell me, where does it stop? i mean a 100 yr ago people would of been shocked to see how women dresses up today, (present day), ok 1950 they started showing cleavage and from there on it continued in the 1970's when they started wearing short skirts, so tell me batesie when is this going to stop? i mean aint there noo limits no more? i mean does this freedom of yours mean dressing how ever you want? please dont tell me that its ok to wear g string on a public high streets, and trust me i think thats just around the corner, and now we are in 2000's where jodie marsh wore a belt over her breasts lol, obviously she thinks its normal because she was born in a time where people though this was natural and ok, but if she was born in 1900 i dont think she would of done that bcoz she would of been born in a yr where people didnt though it was normal and so on. but i get a feeling where you do not want it to stop lol
and about mobile phones, lol please dont compare mobile phones with a hot chick lol
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
NEW WORLD ORDER: http://www.prisonplanet.net http://www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-01-20 18:06 ]
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
Absolutely i completely agree....if i was a women i would'nt like to parade around in a baggy top and baggy bottoms...I just feel sorry for women who have to dress in a certain way just so that they can feel safe and not have pervs look at them.
Posted by Simon N
What a sad sad person this dude is. He could have just joined a porn site and viewed such things if he was that way inclined. I bet the image quality and darkness made the vids near useless anyway.
Thankfully another perv locked up. However when they say Minor what age is that under? How old was she? Only ask as in UK 16 and under is a minor in canada 14 and under so it varies a great deal. If girl was 17 then am guessing other than invasion of privacy the guy would not get treated as harsh in uk.
Are we (as a race) too uptight or not harsh enough?
I personally think there should be a mobile/cell phone operators license. Its free and easy to obtain but should you get caught doing something like this you get your license revoked and are unable to have a mobile phone for x amount of years.
Posted by max_wedge
| Quote: |
|
That's not a bad idea. They could have one to make emergency calls only, or a "work licence" for day time only
Posted by Simon N
Nope a single licence...abuse it and lose it.
You dont get second chances with driving licences.
Posted by max_wedge
well it depends. Any picture of a minor is pretty serious but a picture of a 17 year old girl at the beach, not so clear cut. Loss of phone privileges for life? Bit harsh in my view. Depends on the seriousness of the offence.
Not supporting these wankers or anything, but to say they lose all right to use a mobile phone for ever for one transgression, regardless of the severity? By saying that you are saying that such a person is never capable of existing in society and should be jailed for life to protect the innocent. Currently society still tries to rehabilitate criminals, not just put them inside and throw away the key.
Christ, even people who commit murder get out in several years - are you saying they should never be able to own a car if they killed someone with a vehicle? Or never allowed to handle a knife ever again if they killed with a knife? Stopping a killer from using a knife is hardly going to prevent them from killing again. If you stop a pedophile from using a phone camera they'll use a normal one, or resort to some other means of satisfying their craving (god forbid). Banning them from using a camera for life is only useful if the individual has shown that they are habitual - such as a repeat offender drunk driver who eventually, after many chances, loses their drivers licence for good. However many one or two time offenders learn a lesson and stop drink driving. If you were to take the licence off these people straight up they would learn nothing and go straight back to drink driving, licenced or not. In other words by imposing a lifetime ban, you remove the deterent which encourages them not to drink drive (if they don't have a licence to lose they won't try to keep it by not drink driving).
Posted by methylated_spirit
I've been reading these big long self-righteous posts and all i can say is
Basically anyone caught doing it should be punished, and thats whats happened.
