Posted by john74
http://www.pcwatch.ru/mobile/review/sonyericsson-p800pics2-e.shtml well i hope that this will be fixed because i want the P800 but the photo quility is the same as the 7650......also resolution and size is taken with 640x480.....so what now???see for yourself
Posted by john74
is it blurry around the edges or is it me??
Posted by captainsm
Man, that suck ! It's as bad or worse than the 7650 !!
Guess my good old MCA-20 lives a while longer !
Posted by manuela
John74 untill 1074, wooowww John U are realy so special,but I have to admit,U have to buy glasses,it is a bit bluuryyyy but not like 7650,and also what a stupid picture is the first one!!what understand a bout the photo
Posted by manuela
John74 untill all dear JOHNNSS 1074, wooowww John U are realy so special,but I have to admit,U have to buy glasses,it is a bit bluuryyyy but not like 7650,and also what a stupid picture is the first one!!what to understand a bout the photo
Posted by Starter
The photos put up by Eldar who claims to have taken it with a P800 do not look better than those from the Nokia 7650; certainly not as good as those seen from MCA-20... HOWEVER, Eldar conveniently refused to show any picture of the battery compartment which leads me to believe that his P800 could actually be a prototype unit not actual production model meant for retail... anyway, until someone actually gets a retail version of P800 there is still a possibilities the picture quality might be different from those shown on Eldar's review...
This is very common in digital cameras - the prerelease cameras picture quality can be not as good as the final release (check out sites like dpreview.com)...
Posted by tranquil
In my oppinion, if you want 1st class pictures buy a digital camera. A camera built in to a phone(!) will never be as good as a dedicated one. (Yes, yes, yes... I know I've commented on this before).
The way i'm going to be using the camera is quite simple, I don't carry a camera where ever I go, but I do carry my phone. So the P800 is really just a substitute for the real mc.coy.
Posted by ferrarista44
@tranquil
yup i agree.
i wouldnt expect the cam to be as good as a stand-alone digicam.
it's as if you're expecting a t68's non-scientific calculator to do sines and cosines.
Posted by Froddan
I'm not expecting it to be as good as a real digicam, but I was expecting it to be at least as good as the mca-20. But it's not.
At least not as good as the photos posted here, made by a mca-20.
Posted by anas
it is really non sense to put a camera in a phone unless its a high resolution camera, but maybe it wont be that bad.
Posted by shklar1
Guys did you see this? http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-p800pics1-e.shtml
The pictures here are a bit better.... I think that the images that were taken in the link in the top of the page were not done in optimal conditions, and i think that they don't represent the true quality...
Posted by kerberos
here there is a compare with the MCA-20 and 7650 made by Aftobladet... its in swedish but you can compare the pictures..
http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/it/story/0,2789,198728,00.html
[ This Message was edited by: kerberos on 2002-09-02 13:44 ]
Posted by arroyootje
The quality of the MCA-20 and the P800 are exactly the same.....
It's not like the MCA-20 has brilliant picture quality......
It just depends if you move the camera a little while taking the pic....
Posted by Froddan
Based on the photos I've seen posted here, I'd say that the mca produces better pictures than P800.
To me it seems very strange that SE would have made a poorer quality camera on the P800, than the mca-20.